|
Number |
State
Adopting UMA |
Status
a. introduced
b. adopted, w/out modifications
c. adopted, w/ modifications
d. rejected
|
Modifications, if any |
|
1. |
Connecticut |
d. |
The
Connecticut version of the UMA, SB 598, was introduced in 2006 and did
not pass.
|
|
2. |
District of Columbia
|
c. |
click here
to see modifications |
|
3. |
Hawaii |
a. |
Introduced to the Hawaii Legislature on
January 23, 2009 as SP120
|
|
4. |
Idaho |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
5. |
Illinois |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
6. |
Indiana |
d. |
Introduced in 2005 and did not pass.
|
|
7. |
Iowa |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
8. |
Massachusetts |
a. |
The
Massachusetts version of the UMA is currently pending:
HB1814 -
Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development
|
|
9. |
Minnesota |
a. |
The
Minnesota version of the UMA,
HF1159/SF1478 Emmer/Hottinger House Civil Law, did not pass in 2005 and
has not been reintroduced.
|
|
10. |
Nebraska |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
11. |
Nevada |
a. |
The Senate did not pass the Nevada version
of the UMA, S.B. 292.
|
|
12. |
New Jersey |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
13. |
New York |
a. |
The New
York version of the
UMA S01967 was introduced in 2007 and carried over
to 2008. It is currently under committee consideration.
|
|
14. |
Ohio |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
15. |
Rhode Island |
a. |
The UMA was introduced to the RI General
Assembly on Feb 26, 2009 as act 2009 – S 0765. It was referred to the
Senate Judiciary Committee.
|
|
16. |
South Dakota |
c. |
click here
see adopted text
|
|
17. |
Utah |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
18. |
Vermont |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|
|
19. |
Washington |
c. |
click here
to see modifications
|